Evidence Disputes US Claim of ISIS Bomb in Kabul Drone Strike

Matthieu Aikins / The New York Times
Evidence Disputes US Claim of ISIS Bomb in Kabul Drone Strike Relatives and neighbors survey the damage to vehicles in the courtyard of the home of Mr. Ahmadi. (photo: Jim Huylebroek/NYT)

U.S. officials said a Reaper drone followed a car for hours and then fired based on evidence it was carrying explosives. But in-depth video analysis and interviews at the site cast doubt on that account.

It was the last known missile fired by the United States in its 20-year war in Afghanistan, and the military called it a “righteous strike” — a drone attack after hours of surveillance on Aug. 29 against a vehicle that American officials thought contained an ISIS bomb and posed an imminent threat to troops at Kabul’s airport.

But a New York Times investigation of video evidence, along with interviews with more than a dozen of the driver’s co-workers and family members in Kabul, raises doubts about the U.S. version of events, including whether explosives were present in the vehicle, whether the driver had a connection to ISIS, and whether there was a second explosion after the missile struck the car.

Military officials said they did not know the identity of the car’s driver when the drone fired, but deemed him suspicious because of how they interpreted his activities that day, saying that he possibly visited an ISIS safe house and, at one point, loaded what they thought could be explosives into the car.

READ MORE

Please try to be considerate of other posters. Be respectful of everyone's right to express themselves.
Close

rsn / send to friend

form code