“Electoral Authoritarianism”: Should Elections Control the Government or Should Government Control Elections?
Thom Hartmann The Hartmann Report
From Putin’s Russia to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, dictators have learned that you don’t have to cancel elections to steal democracy. (photo: Getty) “Electoral Authoritarianism”: Should Elections Control the Government or Should Government Control Elections?
Thom Hartmann The Hartmann ReportALSO SEE: The Hartmann Report, Thom Hartmann on Substack
From Putin’s Russia to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, dictators have learned that you don’t have to cancel elections to steal democracy: you just have to terrorize the people who run them...
They all know that federal law has made it a crime for federal law enforcement officers to enter polling places armed (unless there’s an active crime, like a shooting, going on), and has been since 1865, which has them particularly worried about their own possible legal exposure.
Several also noted that what makes this concern particularly cogent and urgent is that they’ve already watched Trump’s and Blanche’s Justice Department use invented claims of “irregularities” to get a judge to sign a warrant that allowed them to march armed agents into Georgia election offices on national television with little blowback and no consequences.
One former senior agent told the reporters how the Bureau used to handle this: